Tuesday, November 15, 2011

The Prescott Film Festival

http://www.contestful.com/sites/default/files/styles/journalcrunch/public/resource.aro_.png


Upon stepping over the threshold and passing through the old, wooden church doors I glanced around the room, rather timidly. The mere presence of the old establishment was quite intimidating. The building’s old-fashioned, pale yellow, brown, and red ceilings and floors were a strange sight to behold, having become used to the hospital-like bleached white walls of the college and of my own home. It was eerily and all at the same time beautifully lit; there was something charming about the way the aged, golden yellow lanterns on the wall touched the walls of the lobby. I was a little nervous about volunteering for the Prescott Film Festival, but the old churches’ appeal somehow illuminated how little there was to fear about the small but perfect revenue.

http://ljepsispol.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/bobine-film-1024x819.jpg


It was at the ticket-desk that I found the director of the film festival. He was a stern-looking older man with apparent enthusiasm for his work. He told me and another volunteer to begin scrawling out the names of the short and feature-length films that we would be showing that day. Soon what started out as slow-paced work to keep the surplus of volunteers busy became the frantic writing of movie titles to the point where our hands began to cramp as the crowds came flooding in, unexpectedly. Several of the volunteers took tickets and directed the audience to their seats as I handed out ballets so that they could vote for their favorite feature film or short. I believe that we, as volunteers, are crucial ingredients to the film festival. It is important to present an air of professionalism and courteousness when showing a film or films in special avenues or during events such as the Prescott Film Festival. Ticket-taking and handing out ballots may not seem the most vital of jobs during a film festival, but the festival could hardly have been done without such services.


http://www.blogcdn.com/blog.moviefone.com/media/2007/02/jamiebabbit.jpg

(Independent filmmaker, director, and writer, Jamie Babbit. A personal idol)

At one point during the screenings, several volunteers were allowed to be seated and view a feature-length film called, The Selling. Directed and produced by Emily Lou, the selling is a film about an unsellable, haunted residence where a murderer had once lived (and died) and killed a gross amount of people (a dozen or so). A kind, timid, and unfortunately for him, honest real-estate seller (played by Gabriel Diani, also a producer and the sole writer of the project) took on the property in attempts to sell it in order to pay for his mother’s cancer treatments. The film was hilarious and I was fortunate enough to only be sat a few seats away from the writer, producers, director, and actors of the film. It was an incredible way to experience watching the film, having been sat so close to the cast and members of the film team; to hear their reactions, laughter, muttering, and inside jokes. I was in rapture of the entire experience, and although it was only a small-niche film I feel very blessed to have experienced the film the way I did.


http://www.beyondhollywood.com/uploads/2011/09/TheSellingPoster-600x910.jpg


I learned so much about what creating films and what slaving over one’s work can yield: amazing memories, new unforgettable relationships with co-workers, and a memorable work of art for (hopefully) all to see and appreciate. I would love to learn more about creating short and feature length films! From the cast of The Selling’s commentary after the film, each member of the team recounted their experience during the project and I felt such pride and accomplishment radiating from each different speaker. I think that working on set of a small or a large film such as The Selling would help me learn so much more about independent filmmaking, and I would definitely be grateful for an experience like that.




One thing that really hit home with me about making independent films from the Prescott Film Festival was one simple and underlying fact: it takes money to make a film. Yes, even when doing small, niche films like The Selling, films cost a lot of money to finance. This fact makes independent film a hard piece of art to put forth into the world (which worries me, as a young film major).


http://www.azundergroundfilmfest.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Anxiously-Waiting2.jpg


Film festivals are so incredibly important to communities, especially small communities including Prescott. I believe that without art, life is not worth living. Audiences, Adults and children alike, feel inclined to let their imaginations run wild; to dream. Without art, aspiring filmmakers would be lost. Sometimes when one knows what one loves to do, such as creating hilarious, inspirational, dreamlike films, one must do just that. It is not a matter of choice. No matter how much the job pays materially, working in film amongst amazing artists, writers, and actors is worth it.


I will most definitely be going to see more independent films in the future, specifically in film festivals. I’ve always been a dedicated independent film fan and follower, but because I have been fortunate enough to be involved in the Prescott Film Festival, I will now undoubtedly be an avid film festival go-er. I’m aware of Flagstaff’s regular film festivals and I will be attending their festivals as often as I can. I look very forward to becoming further immersed in the independent film community.

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Blog Post #2

Godzilla: Cultural Interpretation, Contrast, and Influence

by Critic Neural (a.k.a. Liz Place)


http://images.amazon.com/images/G/01/dvd/gojiro3-large.jpg


In the 1950’s (1954 to be exact), a very monumental film was created. To this day, it is quite hard to find someone in Japan, or even America who has not heard the legendary title, Godzilla (or Gojira). “Gojira” (or more commonly known by American Viewers as “Godzilla”), the legendary sea monster, is sent quite literally by storm onto the shores of Odo Island one night after a tremendous hurricane. The monster, “Gojira”, is essentially a mindless, gigantic, and furious creature. Dr. Yamane, a man investigating the instances of terror surrounding Gojira and the people of the island, comes to the conclusion based on his studies that Gojira came into being as a product of a nuclear explosion. Because of this fact, Gojira’s creation is rather controversial to the researchers and town’s people. Many of Tokyo’s people are enraged that a nuclear explosion is the cause of the existence of Gojira, and others believe it best that this fact be kept secret for fear of more war or further destruction. Eventually, Dr. Yamane forfeits his life so that the secrets of the existence of Gojira with be safe and will be forever out of dangerous hands. The monster is vanquished and Tokyo is safe.

http://blog.saltpublishing.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/godzilla1954_profesor_tanabe.jpg


Directed by Ishiro Honda and written by Ishiro Honda and Takeo Murata, Gojira was and remains to this day as the sole, infamous monster movie/science fiction thriller of all time; regardless of how technology has advanced and, in turn, the quality of horror, thriller, and action films have improved, "Gojira" will always be a beloved and respected film that surpasses most others belonging to its genre.


http://cdn.screenrant.com/wp-content/uploads/Godzilla-1998-Modern-Day.jpg

-Godzilla, 1998 (American film)

The 1998 American adaptation of Gojira (Godzilla) stays relatively loyal to the open-ended plot of the original. Once again, nuclear testing is a main theme in the 1998 adaptation. And as though by fate, the radiation from the nuclear testing site in French Polynesia has tainted a lizard's nest, and Godzilla is, in a manner of speaking, reincarnated. The film even gives a nod (or a few) to "Gojira" by showing a Japanese Fishing boat being attacked by the monster. The only living survivor of the fleet is a man trying to verbalize what it is he thought he saw; "Gorjira" was all that he could manage to utter. One might possibly wonder where the new pronunciation for Gorjira originated from; reporters of the time mispronounced the correct title, "Gorjira", because (of course) they are ignorant Americans! There really aren't any truly distinctive differences between the two films other than, well, culture. Japan is very theatrical and America is, admittedly, overly dramatic and at times obnoxious in it's attempts to make a perfectly good film "bigger", "better", and "flashier" (as is typical of America; although it is endearing in a lot of ways and in a lot of films).

http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2006/04/godzillaL120406_450x300.jpg



"Gorjira" of 1954 was dramatically different from "Godzilla" of 1998. For one thing, the American film was in color! Technology had advanced... it had been 44 years for pete sake! Well, lets admit it... apart from the similar if not exactly the same plots and endings of the films, there are nothing but differences. For me personally, the reviews are definitely what set these two films apart from each other. Audiences actually received Gorjira (in fact, they ate it up... and us film geeks continue to) but when it comes to `Godzilla, audiences weren't all that receptive; Audiences were duped into watching the poorly written, poorly constructed sequel-rip-off by showing just enough to get the viewers excited about the possibility of a promising film. As for the plot and character changes that were truly "necessary" for the transfer from the original Japanese version of the film to the newer American version of the film, they are as such: First of all, the creatures (the "Godzillas") of both films were altogether different. One was simply a ravenous mutated horrific monster (in the 1954 version), and in the American version the so called "monster" had a heart; Godzilla was simply a misunderstood, confused, and terrified animal doing its best to survive. The mutated lizards differed in this way, and also in that the original lizard spouted fire, whereas the preceding lizard did not. I believe that Godzilla made in 1998 was romanticized quite a lot more, and cared about the actual plot a whole lot less than that of its original, Gorjira. Gorjira is quite different when it comes to audience it is aiming to receive; it's more aimed toward the more serious fans of science fiction action movies. In conclusion, these films are aimed toward two very different audiences; Japanese humor, drama, and science fiction themes are far different from American standards of humor, drama, and film quality.


For your viewing pleasure, I happened upon a rather funny (and-caution-slightly irritating) evaluation of Godzilla (1998).

Enjoy!

-Critic Neutral